AMSTERDAM—Whether triple anti-thrombotic therapy should be accepted as generally the optimal approach for treating patients at high risk of having a myocardial infarction was scrutinised in a debate at the 2013 annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology here. Professor Harvey White from the University of Auckland in New Zealand and Dr Rikke Sørensen from Copenhagen University Hospital examined whether triple anti-thrombotic therapy could be too much of a good thing. While Dr JM Ten Berg from St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands and Professor Robert Storey from Sheffield University in England raised the question of whether it could be possible to drop the use of aspirin altogether. Co-chairing the discussions — along with Dr Robert Giugliano, from Boston — was Professor John Camm of St George’s University of London. Peter Goodwin asked him how much the novel oral anti-coagulants have contributed to changing the outlook for anti-thrombotic therapy.
- Previous story PD 1 inhibitor nivolumab shows promising activity in metastatic melanoma
- Next story SAVOR-TIMI 53 study: saxagliptin had better glucose control than placebo but no cardiovascular benefit
- Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Just As Effective for Prostate CancerMay 16, 2018
- First evidence that genome editing made patients with AIDS more resistant to HIVMarch 8, 2014
- Anticoagulation with warfarin can be beneficial in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease.March 7, 2014
- Prostate cancer: Adult exposure to bisphenol-A linked to prostate cancer riskMarch 6, 2014
- MMR vaccine’s non-specific effects: adherence to recommended vaccination schedules protects children against non-vaccination-specific infections tooFebruary 28, 2014