Primary angioplasty after a myocardial infarction is also better than thrombolysis in a real world setting: though up to two hours after the infarction the two methods are equivalent, according to Swedish findings from a study of 21 000 patients. Ulf Stenestrand of University Hospital in Linköping presented the results.
[audio:https://www.audiomedica.com/podcasting/aha2005/Ulf_Stenestrand.mp3]
Mandeep Mehra talks about his report in the New England Journal of Medicine on the inflammatory effects of COVID-19 infection and the implications...
Atrial fibrillation is prevented by exercise and life-long endurance athletes do not face the same elevated risks of stroke and heart disease from...
AMSTERDAM—Whether triple anti-thrombotic therapy should be accepted as generally the optimal approach for treating patients at high risk of having a...
AMSTERDAM — The SAVOR-TIMI 53 study in 16 000 patients has confirmed the efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitor, saxagliptin, for controlling glycaemia in...
AMSTERDAM—Whether triple anti-thrombotic therapy should be accepted as generally the optimal approach for treating patients at high risk of having a...
AudioMedica News Young adults less likely to be diagnosed with hypertension than over 60s Play Episode Pause Episode Mute/Unmute Episode Rewind 10...
